11/26/2022 0 Comments Google analog efex pro![]() ![]() Spend a few minutes considering your ratings and the reason for each. ![]() That’s time I can’t invest in running my business so ultimately it costs me money.Īs with the previous assessment of collection, it’s likely your reasons for rating the Nik tools will differ to mine. It would though take me much more time to create the selections and make the adjustments. I’m perfectly capable of achieving the same results using Adobe Photoshop. I rated Nik Viveza as essential because of the speed improvement it affords my workflow. For example, what is it about this tool that makes it “Essential” in your work. Now you understand which of the tools are the most important to you, it’s worth considering why. It’s likely your needs will be different to mine so be sure to do this exercise yourself. The example assessment here reflects my own personal use of the tools. Image sharpening to bring out fine details. Merging multiple exposures into a single image with increased dynamic range. Special effects.Ĭreative effects filters for retouching and special effects.īlack and white conversion and darkroom special effects. Find Your Essential Nik Tools ProductĪnalog film, camera and lens simulation. If you’re looking for an alternative it’s worth taking a moment to consider which you find Essential, Useful or May need in the future (but don’t currently use). Here then is a list of the tools in the Nik Collection and their purpose. ![]() You need only browse the internet and discussion forum arguments to realise this. The collection offers a wide range of tools and different people will have different needs. Maybe ACDSee Ultimate 10 will fill in those gaps and we then will be able to completely retire those external editors.Before searching for an alternative to the Nik Collection, it’s worth spending a moment to consider the tools. But unfortunately there's still some "heavy-lifting" editing that can only be done in an external editor like PhotoLine or Photoshop. With actions and adjustment layers, Ultimate 9 has strengthened the edit function of ACDSee tremendously. I'm sure it's because very few of their customers use PhotoLine. I have corresponded with ACDSee support about PLD thumbnails several times, but there is no interest in providing proper support for PLD files. Their mostly-European customer base doesn't seem to care. The mess with PLD thumbnails could be solved if PhotoLine would adopt the Microsoft standard, but the brothers who design and support the program don't want to pay Microsoft royalty fees, according to postings on the PhotoLine forum. #Google analog efex pro Patch#Recently the publishers of PhotoLine apparently altered the code, making the FastPictureViewer patch inoperable. #Google analog efex pro windows#That enabled Windows Explorer to create thumbnails for the PLD file format (but not ACDSee). I prefer the generic PLD icon so that I can find the file faster.Ī few years ago FastPictureViewer added thumbnail support for PLD files to its separately-sold codec. With the suggested "decode" option selected, ACDSee finds the internal PLD JPG, creates a thumbnail, then labels the file-type "JPG." When you're looking at many thumbnails, a mislabeled thumbnail is not very practical even though the file can be run in PhotoLine from Ultimate 9. Did you activate the plugin-settings? If there really is no thumbnail for PLDs anymore, that would be a big drawback for me.Įdit: I installed the English demo and you still get a thumbnail from PLDs, it you have activated "Try to decode files that do not have recognized image extensions" in the Plug-in Settings.I use the setting that places the file-type on the thumbnail created by ACDSee. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |